Withdrawing life support essay

This gives surrogates the opportunity to help others, despite the grief and the loss of a loved one. Medical treatment in this situation may be deemed inappropriate.

Justice is often regarded as being synonymous with fairness and can be summarized as the moral obligation to act on the basis of fair adjudication between competing claims.

I will now discuss the question of retaining or withdrawing life support for dying patients; providing food and fluids by tubes is a common form of life support for weak, injured, or unconscious patients.

In paediatrics all care decisions taken should reflect the child's best interests. Allow families to come to terms with death. If the patient has put their expectations in a Living Will the family will make the decision of withdrawing life supporting measures more easily than if they are deciding what their loved one Would have Wanted.

I looked at him and asked what he wanted as my mothers heart grew weaker and leading to a point of ceasing and he said that they spoke about this and she wanted a natural death.

This is a very long time of waiting and fighting for everyone concerned. The likelihood of patient benefit is key. At this stage, deciding to unplug the machines would not be as difficult. To interpret autonomy positively, by contrast, would arguably entitle everyone to any requested treatment, regardless of medical advisability or competing claims for scarce resources.

As neonatal nursing is founded on the principles of family centered care this creates potential Withdrawing life support essay of interests between the neonate, the mother, the two parents and the family. While not everyone on life support will be an organ donor, increasing the amount of organs that will be donated each year is a godsend.

However, post facto third party reviews would routinely be triggered in cases where the withheld treatment might reasonably have been expected, the patient died as a result or the treatment was withheld after specific deliberation by the healthcare team.

The British Medical Association 12 recommends that treatment should be continued in cases of disagreement between doctors and patients, but only for a short time presumably until the patient sees its futility.

I did not have advance directives until was faced with the unexpected death of my mother, who avgas on a ventilator for aggressive treatment Of pneumonia. Orlowski et al 7 insist on the permission of the patient before removing a ventilator; yet, they also state that doctors have no obligation to provide useless care or care that violates established community standard of practice.

The decision to withhold life-support treatments and when. The No Chance Situation. Respect for autonomy is the moral obligation to respect the autonomy of others in so far as such respect is compatible with equal respect for the autonomy of all potentially affected.

The right-to-die means being able to make intelligent decisions so that we may die at the best possible time by the best means. The child has such a severe disease that life sustaining treatment simply delays death without significant alleviation of suffering.

Maybe laws are needed to regularize the withdrawal of life-supports. Braddock 15 defines treatment as futile if it may no longer fulfil any of the goals of medicine, which he lists as to cure, palliate or improve functional status.

Continual adjustments to counteract side-effects, controlled by another drug with side-effects and then another drug to control those particular side-effects, and so on, it becomes a viscous cycle. Decisional authority Of the tools that acknowledge the centrality of values, some foreground patient decisional authority.

Most ethical conflicts involve issues Of autonomy and beneficence, and most of these conflicts involve the family.

Whichever way you look at it, pain and suffering is a common denominator in a battle regarding life support. Some of our principles form the basis for our own medical ethics.

Life in an intensive care unit is in no way similar to the life lived up to this point. Most ethical conflicts involve issues of autonomy and beneficence, and most of these conflicts involve the family.

Advances in prenatal screening and diagnosis has changed the emphasis and dilemmas now exist surrounding extreme premature infants with neurological damage McHaffie and Fowlie In February 25,she collapsed in her home due to full cardiac arrest.

The child who develops this state following trauma or hypoxia and is reliant on all others for all care and does not act or relate with the outside world.

Withdrawal Of Life Support

Safeguarding to Premature Withdrawal of Life-Supports We as the patients need protection from mistakes and abuses of any protocol that allows withdrawal of life-support systems. If in fact we are being kept alive by any form of medical equipment, any choices made about the best time to die and the best means to allow our deaths should contain queries about what to do with the life-support systems in place, sustaining life Lin, Doctors and nurses have an obligation in beneficence which is to help patients in what they do and non-maleficence which is not to hurt them Hinson-Penticuff The Brain Dead Child.

Such decisions should be put into our Advance Directives for Medical Care. Medical treatment in this situation may be deemed inappropriate.

List of 8 Main Pros and Cons of Life Support

Her heart failed and the decision was to resuscitate her or allow her to have a natural death. The principle behind withholding and withdrawal of life support states that treatment may not be initiated if the patient or surrogate refuses.

There have been cases, however, when physicians suggest for treatments to be withdrawn, but the patient’s parents strongly argued against it. withholding and withdrawing life support – passive euthanasia, in other words – is generally thought to be morally acceptable (under certain restraints, of course), and in fact these practices have become absolutely common in North American hospitals.

Will now discuss the question Of retaining Or Withdrawing life support for dying patients; providing food and fluids by tubes is a common form of life support for weak, injured, or unconscious patients. Basic Life Support Essay Basic life support (BLS) is the level of medical It may be that the decision to withhold or withdraw life support is most likely to pit the hopes and fears of patients and their families against medical science and their physician.

Patients are compelled by powerful emotions (such as guilt) or by adherence to. Withholding and withdrawinglife support Withholding and Withdrawing Life Supporting Treatment in Neonates The author will critically examine an ethical issue that.

Ethical Challenges in Withdrawing Life Support

Consensus over ethical equivalence. Of the 49 guidance documents, 29 deal with the ethical equivalence of withholding versus withdrawing life support from acutely ill patients, and 28 of these state they are ethically or legally equivalent acts.

Withdrawing/Withholding Life Support: Pros and Cons Essay Sample Withdrawing life support essay
Rated 4/5 based on 75 review
Withdrawing life support essay